• Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    the gap doesn’t seem massive, couldn’t this just be importance of owning a car by “stage of life?” obviously people with kids, jobs, no knees etc… need cars more than uni students.

    • modifier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Honestly geography seems to be the most important factor, rather than generation.

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Many of us don’t have the desire or ability to cough up $50,000+ for a badly made piece of shit that does nothing but violate our privacy and contributes to everything we hate about our cities.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      $50k???

      the most expensive car I have ever purchased was 11% of that.

    • Sasquatch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This seems disingenuous. Privacy concerns are valid, but you can get a new car (Ford Maverick) for $25k. The hybrid powertrain would only be $1k more, for an ~40% reduction in fuel consumption

  • unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d love to not have a car, but there’s not a train that runs to the slopes and the busses cost more than twice as much as the gas to get there.