• thejevans@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s nice. If your goal is to ever talk to people about open source software, that’s going to create a lot of unnecessary confusion.

    On top of that, accepting this bolsters companies to use this kind of a definition specifically to take advantage of the mental model that many people have connecting “open source” with OSI.

    • rhabarba@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      If your goal is to ever talk to people about open source software, that’s going to create a lot of unnecessary confusion.

      I guess that my definition of open source is not that uncommon, given that the terms “free software” and “libre software” exist and are rather well-established by this point.