The poll shows that public views of Musk are increasingly polarized, with Republican support of the billionaire rising while Democratic support falls.

Elon Musk’s support among Democrats has withered to a new low as he has embraced Republican politics, according to a national NBC News poll.

Only 6% of Democrats in the poll, which was conducted Sept. 13-17, said they had positive feelings about Musk, while 79% said they had negative feelings. The numbers were flipped for Republicans, with 62% having positive feelings toward him and 14% negative feelings. Independents were split, 31% to 36%.

The poll shows that views of Musk are increasingly polarized, reflecting the transformation of his public image in recent years from that of an environmentally aware automaker crusading against fossil fuels to that of a conservative activist aligned with former President Donald Trump.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      24 hours ago

      YOU might not. But I’m sure the politicians and bureaucrats who determine whether Musk’s businesses continue getting billions in taxpayer funded subsidies would sure like to know if the public is behind continuing to do that. I for one would consider it a bonus if say, the Democrats won control in November, looked at the numbers and decided none of their supporters are behind Musk, determined he’s been playing fast and loose using taxpayer dollars to fund pushing his own political agenda, and turned off the free ride.

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          They don’t. But if they already have it in for someone, which the Democrats in Congress almost certainly do right now, public opinion can give them a cover to act.

          It’s certainly not for our benefit, but if one group of shitlords wants to take another shitlord down a few pegs, I’m certainly going to enjoy the show.

    • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      The next tesla model will have a coal oven inside it. Will still run on electricity, the oven is just in there so you can do some pollution too. The main factor in making the electric part palpable to republicans will be telling them how brown people are being exploited to get the materials for the batteries out of the ground.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nah, it will be worse. Tesla will start selling a hybrid model with a generator onboard that can charge the battery as you go. That generator will be designed to be fueled by ground-up burning tires, unrecycleable plastic, and human hair. .

  • e$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I can only see ‘being a billionaire’ as ‘stealing from the population at large’. So you’re saying the biggest thief of society is still popular among 6% of democrats.

  • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Poll of whom, you ask?

    Interviews: 1,000 Registered Voters, including 870 respondents interviewed via cellphone. Date: September 13-17, 2024

    They obviously don’t poll those of us who don’t answer calls from numbers we don’t recognize.

    And don’t return sketchy voicemails. We Olde learned this in the days of “Caller ID” as an extra paid service.

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        95
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Haha I think I met one!

        Dude was a eco-friendly pro-Kamala pro-weed driving a Tesla.

        When I made a joke about buying a Tesla before Elon went crazy, he kinda sheepishly shrugged and then excitedly talked about all the new things Tesla is coming out with.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          48
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Being excited about technological progress at Tesla or SpaceX doesn’t mean you’re a fan or supporter of Musk. These companies are full of thousands of engineers doing this work while the absentee CEO is spending his time shitposting and driving Twitter into the ground.

            • Zementid@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              True. If the engineers and market experts would have had a say in this, they would have made a Micro-Van.

              6 Seats, 3.5x1.8 meters, 300km range, flat pack floor folding seats in the back… AND ALLOWED IN EUROPE FOR NOT BEING A PEDESTRIAN KILLING MACHINE.

              • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                I’d love someone to make a small (at least by today’s standards) electric pickup similar to a 90s ranger or S10. If there was a cargo van I’d certainly consider it though.

                • clif@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  Remember when small trucks were small? I remember. My 2008 Tacoma (which used to be a small truck) seems about the same size as a 90s model Silverado.

                  I remember the late 90s Tacomas and S10s. I want them back.

                  But, I do think we hit critical mass because newer ones seem to be shrinking again… I think.

                • Zementid@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Yeah but maybe smaller. Real innovation needs courage. A K-Car sized Utilitarian Tesla could have lead the way, but they literally fucked up badly.

                  Where is the Roadster 2 btw?

            • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I 100% agree with that and think they need to kick him to the curb. What influence and publicity he could generate for the companies 10 years ago is now long gone and has now transformed into a giant liability.

              • Furbag@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’m honestly shocked that the board hasn’t gotten rid of him yet. he’s just a massive source of problems for them. My suspicion is that he is so good at creating controversy that they can time their watches to it, so to speak, and buy/sell their positions in the company while Elon takes all the heat from the SEC for insider trading, not the crooked board members who know he’s a total whacko but acknowledge the reality that he has a lot of gullible techbros with too much money on their hands hanging on his every word and they will rush to buy Tesla stock or Dogecoin or whatever if Elon says he’s making market moves when he’s actually running his classic pump-and-dump schemes.

                • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  There’s gotta be some truth to this as I was astounded that they approved that $50+ billion payout that he recently received after threatening to quit. In recent years, Tesla has really floundered and is rapidly losing marketshare with each passing day mostly due to Musk’s actions. In what world does that deserve a singular payout valued higher than most corporations earn in an entire year?

          • Kalysta@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Unfortunately that CEO is giving them all a bad name. And the cybertruck is enough of a disaster that it’s destroying the reputation of Tesla by itself.

            I don’t know if you can call the cybertruck progress when it’s fucking up basic stuff already worked out in normal cars. Like manual door releases.

          • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            It’s important to take Tesla and SpaceX at face value and not to extrapolate future success based on what they’ve accomplished.

            Edit: for anyone that follows SpaceX’s current shenanigans, seems like they’ve been using the FAA to scoot permits to launch without proper authorization from other agencies (notably the EPA)

            Shit is getting VERY juicy: https://fixupx.com/RepKiley/status/1839066996274516417

            They’ve even got representatives just kind of going along with their demonstrably false narrative for the ride.

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          55
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Full Self Driving super soon except you still need to intervene regularly and also robotaxis will never work so it’s pointless anyway!

            • Zron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              The worst part is we could definitely have a mars base with today’s technology.

              It’s just not economically or scientifically necessary to set up. Robots can do 99% of what a human can on mars, scientifically speaking, and if they break we can just build another one. If someone dies on mars, it’s gonna global news for weeks.

              And mars doesn’t exactly have a huge open pit of platinum or something we want to mine, so there’s no economic incentive to set up a colony.

              Musk just wants to sell the sci-fi vaporware fantasy to shareholders because SpaceX has one viable product and he’s desperate for no one to notice that.

              • Logi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                SpaceX has one viable product

                Two. I can’t even figure out whether you’re ignoring Starlink or their space launch business. But yeah, the Elonville on Mars obsession makes about as much sense as the Cybertruck.

                • Zron@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I honestly don’t consider starlink to be a SpaceX product.

                  I’d technically owned and operated by them because SpaceX owns starlink LLC, but they did it that way to boost their launch contracts for their one viable product: falcon 9 launches.

                  So since they wanted to split starlink off into its own company, that just so happens to rely 100% on SpaceX for all contracts, then I’ll give it to them. Starlink is its own company. Which means SpaceX still only has one product.

              • dgmib@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Which is good because mars will be about the only inhabitable planet in the solar system if Trump has another term.

          • v_krishna@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Waymo is already operating fully autonomous self driving taxis in SF. Price point is about the same as uber/lyft, a bit cheaper since no tip. And they are all hella nice Jaguars. The difference is Waymo uses lidar and radar to make it work (and also did intensive mapping of city streets). Still needs a lot of work to scale (they do dumb things, but so do human drivers, and are limited to the city so I can’t take one to or from my home in Berkeley yet) but they fully exist and are a viable option today.

            • RinseDrizzle@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Man, after years as a valet ages ago I’m so anti Jaguar. Every single time one came through, it had problems. Owners constantly griped about it being in and out the shop a bunch. Nice at a glance, but plenty of the “luxury” brands are apparently made with fucking plastic and band aids.

            • webadict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Waymo sucks. They get stuck a lot, tend to cost as much or more than Uber and Lyft, and you basically hope they don’t get stuck trying to navigate around situations because you basically wait until remote assistance fixes it. Also, if you live anywhere near where they park the things, you want Waymo to die in a fire because they honk. ALL. NIGHT. LONG.

                • Furbag@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  They get confused and think they are sitting in traffic that isn’t moving, so they occasionally let out a honk. Multiply it by dozens of vehicles and it’s just a cacophony of honking cars with nobody in them.

    • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Probably normie centrists that believe in the myth of a free market economy and supports social safety nets but abhors anyone who uses them.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You almost always have a few percent of nonsensical responses in a poll. People who hate sandwiches but love peanut butter and jelly stuck between two pieces of bread. It’s so consistent that the lack of it is an indication the poll was rigged or badly done.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        That number seems way too low with how far over to the right the party has become in recent years. There’s almost zero progressive representation.

  • TacticsConsort@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Christ, he’s ACTUALLY managed to hit the Lizardman Constant with the dems.

    Now hit it with the Repubs too. Come on Trump. You wanna turn on your ally. You wanna turn on your ally and throw him to your cult soooooo badly. It’ll be really funny I promise

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Trump is easy to manipulate. Go on Truth Social, astroturf the shit out of the idea that Musk is going to backstab Trump. Sit back and enjoy the show.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Many many people are saying it. Trump would have won if Musky Leon actually was a man of his word and ran those Trump ads on X. He promised $45 million of ads during the RNC, but Leon ended up just charging $45 million for the first ad.

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “I, a genius, will alienate the group who want EVs to curry favor with the group who will never buy EVs. Genius, I say.”

      • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The fact that MBS gave Elon $22B in order to buy Twitter gets swept under the rug in literally every discussion. If the narrative was true, that Elon was forced to buy Twitter because he didn’t know when to stop running his mouth, why would MBS be cool with throwing $22B at a thing without any hope of seeing an ROI?

        • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The ROI is the destruction of a social media platform that enabled global protest and solidarity movements toward equality and equity of the lower and middle classes against our global elite; anti hijab movements, women’s equal rights in Muslim countries, black lives matters in western countries, the revolution in France over the retirement age, to name a few.

          Edit: and let’s not forget the impact this has had on growing conservative movements, increased foreign interference in US politics, and the weakening of western democracy.

    • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      He’s just seeing what Trump and the GOP are planning for the US and hopes he’ll be one of the oligarchs at the top in the end.

    • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a strong play if the idea was to take money from oil companies, come into a car company after it was already established, apply his brash personality as the defacto brand of the business, and then crater the sales of that company while the Fed applies 100% tariffs to Chinese EVs, essentially destroying the EV market for anyone who makes under 100k a year.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Who. Fucking. Cares.

    (Not directed at OP, just the idea of the survey in general. Who needed to know this information? Why do they think the public needs to know how popular a random rich guy it’s.)

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      he’s not a random rich guy and claiming that is either disingenuous or irresponsible. though i get the frustration, just because he’s a demonic troglodyte you wish you never heard about anymore doesn’t mean you get to ignore his existence. then they get to do whatever they want.

      pushback, scrutiny and ridicule are the only tools we have against massively influential cunts. and because they’re massively influential, their popularity matters.

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        There’s also the fact that if people hate him enough and realise how genuinely stupid the guy is, they’ll start wondering if the economic system that allowed him to amass the wealth of a country as millions starve might be doing it wrong.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          even before that, if enough people hate him, his personal brand would become toxic and his influence would hopefully shrink.

    • gt24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Someone may want to know if you are a Democrat or Republican (for advertising, for gerrymandering, whatever). That person may not be able to ask you a direct question like that though (or may feel that you may lie about the answer to such a question anyway).

      As such, they likely carry out occasional surveys asking people who are Democrat or Republicans for their opinions on something else. Once they find something else that can strongly correlate your political affiliation with a specific opinion, they know of a new question they can ask someone. That new question should generally reveal what your political party is most likely and they can then proceed with that “most likely” answer.

      So “who cares” is those who cannot directly ask you something. They will ask you something else and use that answer to deduce the information they cannot obtain directly.

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Money is power. Rich people are more powerful than politics. We should care much more about them than we do now. Musk is dangerous. He’s also visible and that’s a good thing. The quiet invisible ones are even more dangerous.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Considering how politically active he is, he might become a politician (even running for president?). A lot of people will care about this if suddenly Elon musk appears in American ballots.

      EDIT: I just remembered that Elon cannot run for USA president. But idk if other political positions are open.

      And seeing how trump can break every law, I don’t see what would prevent Elon from running for president.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        With our current SCOTUS all he has to do is sue then ride it up to SCOTUS and have em declare it unconstitutional to have requirements for office.

      • repungnant_canary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s kind of a paradox - we can’t stop reporting actions of assholes like him because they do things borderline dangerous to society, but that exact reporting gives them the popularity to do all that

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Pretty much every media outlet across the world.

      The opposing party in the UK is electing leaders, and they’ve all been asked what they think of him. Like it or not, but in turning one of the biggest multi-billion dollar social media platforms into a small million dollar right-wing platform for crypto bots, he’s now got a lot of influence on politics across the world.

      What makes it funnier is that he probably doesn’t give a fuck about the Tories in the UK, but if Trump loses he’ll own a right-wing platform with zero influence on what he cares about.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not for us, it is for him.

      He really cares how popular he is, that is why he is buying all these popular businesses to pretend he founded them.

    • neidu2@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      A survey conducted means someone paid for it. I’m having a hard time believing anyone but Elon himself being willing to pay for this survey.