• Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, but has threads made an official statement like this yet on defederation rules? I’m an instance owner so I’m pretty sure I’d just reply back “lol”

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I saw that mentioned on Mastodon, but honestly don’t care enough about Threads to actually look at their TOS. Seems likely though given they’re all about making it as bland and corporate friendly as possible.

    • Trifictional@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea but the difference is most instances have ethical reasons for banning certain content.

      Meta could randomly decide anti-meta content doesn’t belong on their platform. I wouldn’t be surprised if this is already the case.

  • mawkler@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the name of the fediverse services in the image, beside Mastodon and Pixelfed?

  • OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I consider this to be a bad development. I could see Facebook/Meta aggressively growing to become the “default” server, then squashing everybody else. Not to mention all the US intelligence fuckery that will be potentially happening.

    We laugh at this now, but in a few months we might have server admins enforcing Meta TOS on their users for fear of being cut out from the biggest part of the Fediverse.

    I’d propose that right from the get-go, a bunch of instances should band together and defederate from Threads.