Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
Lackner et al. show that individuals with an intermediate level of science knowledge tend to have overconfidence in their own knowledge and negative attitudes to science.
No I didn’t pay to read the article, that’s my point. I read the available portion (the abstract). Making me pay to read whether an abstract has compelling evidence or not is a garbage m9del, that’s my point
You comments suggested it, again, did you pay to read the article or you just read the abstract?
No I didn’t pay to read the article, that’s my point. I read the available portion (the abstract). Making me pay to read whether an abstract has compelling evidence or not is a garbage m9del, that’s my point
Well you said it has zero evidence, which implies you read it
Ah yes, I should be forced to pay yo see if things are true. This is a sustainable model…
Oh wait no it isn’t. Misinformation is at all time highs. Maybe scientists should study why?
My hypothesis: when things become expensive people improvise, this is true with Healthcare and education.