No

Doesn’t apply to Windows, it already has as many back doors & spyware as Deepin

I am not apprehensive towards AI/ML but I don’t want LLMs in my system. I have no need for it and it will just unnecessarily slow down my system. Instead, I want useful ML stuff, some autocorrct or autocomplete or better image processing in my camera app, you know the basic ML stuff that smartphones do since like 2017.

If any KDE developers read this, we seriously and strongly recommend that the KDE team takes a long, close look at Deepin. DDE shows both how pretty and how functional a Windows-style desktop can be, without needing Plasma’s multiple overlapping options. This is what we’d hoped to see in Plasma 6, but didn’t get. It’s probably fair to say that Deepin is the most sophisticated implementation of a Windows-like interface on any OS these days. It’s considerably more flexible and configurable than Windows 11 itself, and it makes Cinnamon, MATE, Budgie, and the others look clunky and old-fashioned. Don’t get us wrong; this grumpy old vulture is happier with the relatively austere and Spartan Xfce, but for those who want something that’s shinier out of the box, DDE shows how it ought to be done. Even Microsoft could learn from the Chinese developers.

Their grass really is greener, and our local vendors should be trying harder.

My response to this is always the same: Our software is FOSS, if you don’t like some parts of it, go fork and improve it yourself, instead of demanding that somebody else does the work for you.

Linux Deepin 23

What even is a “Linux Deepin”? Seems like the editor never interacted with GNU+Linux before.

[…] [D]esktops could learn from [distro].

🤡

For those who want to have a closer look at what deepin does, there’s always DistroWatch. It has been getting a lot of buzz lately.

Deepin

I hope that that’s not pronounced as similarly to “Debian” as it looks like it sounds.