• Poseidon2023@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Are we trying to say that Stalins policies didn’t lead to mass starvation in the USSR causing millions of deaths and untold suffering?

  • XEAL@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The problem is assuming that communism or socialism have to be bundled with a dictatorship.

    No dictatorship is good.

    • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Communism and socialism have been bundled with dictatorship every time they’ve been seriously implemented.

    • Cyber Ghost@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      According to the CIA declassified documents he was not a dictator

      Even In Stalin’s time there was collective leadership. The Western idea of a dictator within the Communist setup is exaggerated. Misunderstandings on that subject are caused by lack of comprehension of the real nature and organization of the Communist power structure. Stalin, although holding wide powers, was merely the captain of a team and it seems obvious that Khrushchev will be the new captain. However, it does not appear that any of the present leaders will rise to the stature of Lenin and Stalin,so that it will be safer to assume that developments in Moscow will be along the lines of what is called collective leadership, unless Western policies force the Soviets to stream-line their power organization. The present situation is the most favorable from the point of view of upsetting the Communist dictatorship since the death of Stalin.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        One has to wonder how you’ve formed your worldview when you’ll take one point from one CIA cable and think it proves your point. Stalin was still a dictator, whether or not the scope of his power was exaggerated by other governments, and there are thousands upon thousands of source documents to draw from on this

        Read further down in this document and it literally discusses the dire food situation in the USSR and the “poor material condition” of its people, contradicting your original point

      • XEAL@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        You know, a dictatorship can take place with a small group of people with absolute power too, it doesn’t have to be a single person.

        “Collective leadership” my ass, that’s an euphemism for the people who caused things like the Nazino Island tragedy.

  • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Stalin was great at feeding his people! We asked a Ukrainian peasant, and they didn’t object! Or move. Or breathe.