• Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 months ago

    All 4 of them are cheaper than the launch price of their 7000 series counterparts. That’s quite good really!

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 months ago

    The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X price is $359, which is a good $40 cheaper than the Ryzen 7 7700X

    Sounds good to me

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Good cpu for most gaming that can be had for 200 bucks. That 3d version is prolly still gaming value sweet spot.

      • Exulion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean sure, and their lineup has changed with the x3d chips, but I just mean $279 for the x600x line isn’t the most expensive they have launched at. I don’t see how it is a ‘dissappointing’ announcement, especially when the prices are naturally going to settle at a lower price most likely after launch anyhow.

  • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Idk welcome to inflation, also the amount of work going to development of these chips is increasing every generation massively. I don’t like the price but you don’t have to buy the most modern CPU every time a new one is released.

  • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    They just don’t outperform the 7000 series and they are kind of more expensive. I guess you can PBO them and get 15% out of them at similar power consumption but that isn’t great for the price difference.